Asylum seekers – what are we afraid of?

In all the kerfuffle and mud-slinging about exactly which tiny developing nation should host a detention centre for processing asylum seekers who come by boat, quite a few issues are being effectively obscured. Now, I’m not going to suggest that this is deliberate. Despite the vicious rhetoric that flies back and forth between the major parties, I don’t really believe that there is an active, evil conspiracy at work here. As the saying goes, ‘never ascribe to conspiracy what can be effectively explained by incompetence’ – or in this case, simple blindness. It may be wilful blindness, but nonetheless, it really seems as though there is an actual inability to consider some things.

Think about the assumptions that are at work here.

1. Asylum seekers who try to reach Australia by boat must be prevented from reaching our migration zone.

2. Any who do manage to survive the dangerous trip from Indonesia need to be detained in an offshore facility until their claims are processed.

These assumptions go largely unchallenged (although, to their credit, the Greens have consistently attempted to bring them into question). Even as Prime Minister Gillard acknowledges how few people attempt to seek asylum in Australia via boat, she reaffirms that detention is necessary, and offshore detention is actually desirable. Opposition Leader Tony Abbott goes even further, seeking to effectively remove any hope of asylum and resettlement with the new Coalition policy announced last week. There are few questions coming from the media, either. Most reports never even raise the issue. The argument is not about whether these things should be implemented, but about the details of how they will happen.

What’s worse is that no good reasons are ever given to justify these stances. Most commonly, the ‘queue-jumper’ argument is used as a catch-all rationalisation. Those who come by boat are taking the places that should go to ‘genuine’ refugees, and so they need to be punished. That will deter others from trying the same approach. Asylum seekers are effectively branded as cheats, selfishly spending huge amounts of money rather than wait their turn. Going even further, some argue that this shows that they are not ‘real’ refugees at all, but so-called ‘economic’ refugees who are just trying to migrate to a country with more opportunities to make money. And look at how much money it takes to get here – if they’ve got so much money, why can’t they just do the ‘right’ thing?

In reality, the majority of people who attempt to come by boat are fleeing countries without an embassy or consulate. In some cases, these countries have strict penalties for those who attempt to leave – including capital punishment. People are forced to undertake dangerous journeys to get to a country that has such facilities. The argument has been made that perhaps they should just seek to enter Pakistan or another nearby country, and join the ‘queue’ there. Such statements betray a lack of knowledge about geographical and political issues. Paradoxically, it can actually be safer to reach Indonesia and strike out for Australia, than to attempt to get to a closer country.

The idea that asylum seekers are wealthy completely ignores an appalling fact. People fleeing for their lives will do anything to keep themselves and their families safe. They will sell every possession they have. They will borrow money from anyone who will lend it to them – and given their situation, this often means placing themselves in debt to organised crime groups. Finally, some people smugglers will offer to take people for a lesser fee – provided they enter into an agreement to pay their debt once resettled. Again, this usually has criminal ties, and people may effectively find themselves bound into indentured servitude.

Occasionally one or both sides will play the ‘humanitarian’ card, arguing that everything possible should be done to deter people from making the risky voyage. This usually goes hand-in-hand with the idea of taking a ‘strong stance’ against people smuggling. By making it harder to reach Australia by boat, people will be less attracted to the ‘product’ that people smugglers are selling, driving them out of business.

Apart from the hideously comic idea of attempting to solve an ongoing human crisis by appeal to market forces, this argument is frankly ridiculous. Asylum seekers are desperate people who need to escape, and they will take whatever means are available to them to do so. They will sell themselves into hock, risk their lives on unseaworthy boats, and suffer through detention and processing. There is no deterrence factor at work here – and even if there is, all that these punitive measures actually achieve is to place asylum seekers in an untenable position; stay, and risk imprisonment, persecution or death, or go and risk debt, imprisonment or death. There is nothing humanitarian about turning back boats, detention or Temporary Protection Visas. The only people being punished are the very ones who are seeking help.

Neither of these arguments answer the basic question: why must asylum seekers be prevented from reaching Australia? The Opposition’s rhetoric has been almost hysterical – there is an ‘armada’ of boats, a ‘tsunami’ of asylum seekers, or a ‘peaceful invasion’. All their language is designed to portray an imminent threat to Australia. Their most recent television ads showed huge red arrows barrelling towards the country, evoking those animations beloved of old war movies that show the inexorable march of the dreaded enemy forces. Recently, these ads have disappeared, but they left their mark on the Australian psyche.

But what might actually happen if asylum seekers did get here? To answer that question all we really have to do is look at our own history. Have we unwittingly let terrorists into the country, who have wreaked havoc? No. Have we seen Australians robbed of their jobs? No. Have asylum seekers become a huge drain on the welfare system, plunging the country into debt. No. What we see, over and over, are asylum seekers being granted refugee status, taking their place in Australian society, working hard and building strong ties with their local communities.

If they are not dangerous, why are both major parties so keen to have them processed offshore? The short ugly answer is ‘out of sight, out of mind’. Geographical isolation is very effective in removing the issue from public scrutiny. Media would need to make international trips to report on the situation, or liaise with local organisations – and we saw during the Pacific Solution how difficult this proved to be, once the government agreed to restrict access. Most of us learn about asylum seekers through the media – once that channel is narrowed, or even closed, we will have only politicians to tell us what is actually going on.

But maybe I’m seeing too much conscious thought at work here. Maybe it’s even simpler than that. Maybe what is at work here is simple xenophobia. Circle the wagons, protect the women and children, the boat people are coming! They might be terrorists! They can’t be trusted! They’re not like us! Up and down the country, the language of fear and hatred is pervasive.

What are we all so afraid of?

The Greens have been arguing for years for a compassionate view of the asylum seeker issue. Over and over again they have said there is nothing to fear from people who come by boats. We take very few refugees compared with other countries – we rank 47th in the world based on numbers, 68th per capita and 77th based on wealth – yet we are implementing ever more punitive policies against them. Senator Sarah Hanson-Young has said that Australia, as a nation committed to the idea of ‘a fair go and justice’, should be doing more, not less, to help. We have the resources to do so, she said.

It’s a strong, consistent position, argued with solid figures and a great deal of passion. But is it reaching anyone but their own supporters? Looking around, you’d have to say it’s not. And until people – and politicians – can be forced to declare just why they are so afraid of desperate people in boats, I’m afraid it will stay that way. As long as the xenophobia is buried under vagueness, and allowed to escape rigorous examination, there is little possibility that it can be effectively refuted.

We Australians don’t want to think of ourselves as racist, or unfair, or anything but decent people. We should confront our own fears unflinchingly, drag them out into the light of rational argument and start looking at the real situation. Most importantly, and most urgently, we should start seeing asylum seekers as fellow human beings who need our help.

Advertisements

8 Responses to Asylum seekers – what are we afraid of?

  1. […] And for no good reason. There’s no ‘Islamist’ conspiracy to flood Australia with militants who will rise up and institute Sharia law. There’s no ‘erosion of our values’ or ‘threat to our way of life’. No one’s being forced to eat halal meat, wear a burqa or attend a mosque. Our kids aren’t required to learn Arabic in schools so they can be compelled to read the Koran. Despite relentless fear-mongering to the contrary, what we’ve seen is that refugees are – shockingly – just like everyone else. […]

  2. […] Asylum seekers – what are we afraid of? Posted: July 27, 2010 by Notion Factory in Marian Dalton, Media, Politics, Refugees Tags: asylum, asylum seekers, australia, Election, government, Julia Gillard, media, politicians, politics, refugees, Tony Abbott 0 A Notion by Marian Dalton – Originally Posted at The Conscience Vote […]

  3. Mark says:

    A very informative post. You make me want to think about this stuff, and consider exactly what we are afraid of.

    I’d really like to learn a bit more, from as much factual (or as close to factual as is available) information.

    Can you give me some links about/expand on these:
    – “In reality, the majority of people who attempt to come by boat are fleeing countries without an embassy or consulate.” – which countries? stats on numbers/ embassies?
    – “What we see, over and over, are asylum seekers being granted refugee status, taking their place in Australian society, working hard and building strong ties with their local communities.” – I’d love to read about some examples.
    – “We take very few refugees compared with other countries” – where did these stats come from?

    If you have some more info/links about these things, please contact me with them. Thanks for putting in the time.

  4. Kirk says:

    Great work !
    Many people have said to me why doesn’t Labour follow the greens on this. Aren’t Labour supposed to be for the little guy. Our politicians are a product of our electorate. If we have have a close minded xenophobic electorate then they will vote for a xenophobic leader with a closed door policy on immigration. And lets face it. After twelve years of the Howard government the electorate are seasoned closet racists. With rhetoric like ” I’m not a racist, but”. (There’s that “B” word.) things aren’t going to change overnight. Sadly, it will take time to change the electorate. And allaying the fear that some have from their “I am comfortable the way things are now” attitude.

    So, why does labour appear to be supporting the same closed door policy this election? Especially when the Greens are doing the opposite. The answer is that unlike the Greens who can make any policy they want without having to worry about actually being voted in to implement it. Labour don’t have such a luxury. Labour have the opportunity to be elected. And like it or not they are far better overall than the conservatives.

    Hopefully in the short term future labour can and will lift the scab on this and put the electorate through the pain necessary to get over this irrational fear of good decent people wanting to make better lived for themselves and their families. Change in this country on this issue will take time. We, as a nation and people need to get out of our comfort zone and get to know these new Australians. And hopefully realize that we are all human beings. Some good, some bad.

    Keep spreading the good words my friend. Challenge people when they make negative comments. Make them think before they open their mouth. Humans are pack animals. We follow and conform to the rest of the pack about what behavior is and isn’t acceptable.

    Lets make this closed door policy unacceptable behaviour.

    • Thanks for your comments – you’ve hit the nail on the head, I’m afraid. Is it just some cynical vote-buying exercise? If Labor really is ‘for the little guy’ or ‘for the worker’, why aren’t they listening to those who are calling for a more compassionate policy.

  5. Another fantastic post. Will share this one everywhere I can.

  6. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by withheld, horngirl. horngirl said: Asylum seekers – What are we afraid of? http://is.gd/dsTJo Great, informed, intelligent blog post, well worth spreading around […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: