Open Thread – our own Afghanistan debate

Coming soon: a report on the Q&A with the Australian Sex Party’s Fiona Patten at La Trobe University this week. But first …

This week saw the first Parliamentary debate on Australia’s involvement in Afghanistan. This was one of the key elements in the Labor Party’s agreement with the Greens, and welcomed by Independents Andrew Wilkie and Rob Oakeshott. Thanks to the wonders of technology, anyone who cares to has been able to follow the debate.

Most of the speakers are fairly predictable. This is a ‘just war’, we have to ‘stay the course’, etc. There were a few highlights, though. Julia Gillard kicked off the proceedings by announcing that our troops would be in Afghanistan until at least 2014, and that Australia would likely be ‘engaged’ there for the rest of the decade. Tony Abbott urged us to be careful that we didn’t execute a de facto ‘Western takeover’. Sussan Ley, unexpectedly, called for future military engagements to be subject to a Parliamentary vote. Adam Bandt said we should get our troops out as soon as possible, and Andrew Wilkie nearly broke down while reading the names of every Australian soldier killed while serving in Afghanistan to date.

It can be enlightening to hear what our politicians have to say on the matter – especially when, in effect, they’re committing us to the longest war we have yet participated in, outstripping the Vietnam conflict.

But what about the rest of us? You know, us – the ‘Australian public’, the ones our politicians are supposed to listen to and represent. We’ve heard a lot this week about what ‘Australians want’, mostly from people who, I suspect, neither know nor care what we do want.

So let’s have our own mini-debate. Let’s talk about why we’re in Afghanistan.

What are we hoping to achieve?

Have our objectives changed over the years?

Should we have gone there in the first place?

Are we really ‘denying terrorists a safe haven’?

Do we have the right to impose our political system on another country?

Should we talk to the Taliban and other factional powers in the region, instead of propping up the increasingly shaky and corrupt Karzai government?

What if our actions there are making the situation worse?

And what about next time?

Please, encourage people to add their feelings, engage with each other – get a real discussion going. This may be only one small forum, but it’s a forum that wants to hear what everyone thinks.


25 Responses to Open Thread – our own Afghanistan debate

  1. Percival was finally accepted which wedding needs place, when he had wanted from the beginning, prior to a end of the year. More than likely, Coach Factory Outlet the ceremonies transpire in the latter part of December. The gala 11th birthday of Miss Fairlie in late March.

  2. You may download music using this and as well get lyrics.

    Some will provide motivation to keep you running or working out, others to stop you from eating bad
    food and some to give you that extra motivation needed to lose those last
    few pounds. Interesting in this context is obviously the phone locator functionality, which
    boasts the following features:.

  3. Way back in 2003, before she was famous, she was just another girl on the party scene in LA, and best friends with Paris Hilton. She was dating a rapper named Ray J at the time and the two headed off for Mexico and filmed what would become one of the most downloaded videos the internet has ever seen…
    Dubbed Kim K Superstar, the 39 minute DVD was released in 2007 after Porn purveyor Vivid bought the rights and settled with Kardashian for $5 million dollars and immediately began selling the footage. The DVD sold over 1 million copies.
    Now, in a new twist, Vivid has released all of their Kim K sex tape footage… and it’s even more uncensored and longer than we imagined.
    Dubbed “Kim K Superstar, Part 2” the full online version is over 1 hour 40 minutes long.

  4. woodhzcl says:

    e again how?The position is lofty is what ghd sale I wait small fairy can with Ji Yu?Bulb of lily pretty woman#8217;s sighing tone doesn#8217;t know in fairyland no man temple for month brocade of heartless can but the everyones all hope to get his love.

    Speak of a temple brocade for month he fixs what way become immortal in 5,000 year agos.Have been concentrating on and decline the peace or chaos that the demon Fu is evil and protects the whole mankind after becoming immortal.Every 500 year fairyland and evil boundary will have a new war but ever since that time was become immortal is almost led the whole fairyland by to squared an evil clan.

    So say a to is no man in the position of fairyland ability and of.Plus he the outward appearance of handsome beautiful pomp was also a captive the heart of 10,0

    The red Wu well doll uped some kind of arrive at Pan Taoyuan along with numerous pretty women.Sees many fairies swarm about too ascend old Long Wang in gentleman East China Sea too platinum star the month is old

    Seven fairy maidens skirt in seven kinds of colors#8217; center in Pan Taoyuans are lightly moving to dance that Pin a smile to loiter circumlocution to keep teaching a person hard forget.

    The red Wu attends to not and up to take part in Pan peach party for the very first time of excited that the strength Song wears one the small head dried melon seeds look for a temple for month everywhere brocade the figure of the .

    The bulb of lily pretty woman Yan mouth a smile the figure of my silly younger sister to still use you me to look for?Numerous pretty women can all raise head to hope.The Re temple month brocade just just come.

    The silver silk white tunic cold jade belt dress Jin place Zhui the just some ghd outlet little white floss a head of,such as the hair of Pu Mo, follow back Qing Xie but next impose a hair to take in the crest loose loose the ground start to tie up part.The Feng Mou Cheng Che that is up long to pick deep Wen Run contain feeling just smile don#8217;t smile ground to slowly walk.

    Hey Hey.The red Wu wipes off the saliva of corner of mouth can the eye pupil son is still to stare continuously ground to stare at the temple month brocade.The ghd outlet ghd outlet p good elder sister says how then the perfect pretty woman can go together with of top we

    The bulb of lily pretty woman disagrees ah it is said that that 1,000 year agos have the pretty women to form a continuous stream to vindicate to the .

    Then hair words as long as the evil clan still exists for a day he temple month brocade can#8217;t have idea to talk that the feeling says love.

    You this wench even if has never said words like that is your ghd mini ability and together?All of that are the infatuated crazy ideas!Or much the flower order time to fix fairy be like we after small fairy house like this wait until a hundred years the Li rob all generally is can hardly carry on the shoulder pass by ofYou this wench even if has never said words like that is your ability and together?All of that are the infatuated crazy ideas!Or much the flower order time to fix fairy be like us after small fairy house like this wait until a hundred years the Li rob all generally is can hardly carry on the shoulder past.

    H#8217;m H#8217;m.Red Wu point the words that nod to mean to agree with bulb of lily pretty woman very much.Can her eyes imitate statue of Buddha is have a piece of loadstone to absorb she generally and tightly stares at a temple the brocade is for month.

    The voice is deep and low but again the pure Yue listen to hear in but as if the bead jade fall dish generally wonderful the spring breeze imitating a Buddha#8217;s kissing noodles Qin is unexpectedly unspeakable and comfortable and quiet and peaceful into the heart lung.

    It is well boring.The red Wu discomfort cent ground sits Jue on the ghd blue stool the red lips says to the bulb of lily pretty woman why do we have no Pan peach to eat?

    Is it already unusually lucky me to wait small fairy to still want to eat Pan peach to can take part in Pan peach party?That Pan peach can increase a hundred years to fix for!

    That that that I can not eat Pan peach I still appreciate a well like the red Wu frustratedly hangs a head eyes often the Piao is to the directions of ghd outlet p temple month brocade.

    A Pan peach can increase a hundred years to fix to ten Pan peaches and then can increase to fix to 100 Pan peaches for thousand years and then can increase ten thousand years to fix for

    This pretty woman why have been staring at this could it be that there is ghd blue serenity dirty mark on this face?The temple month brocade in the distance is lazy to start words inside unclearly deeply several silks smile good-looking Mou son of idea an on every occasion stare at red Wu.

    He always dislikes to take part in party of can Pan peach the party is just an unique fairyland at a time for 500 years, he is ability the nonappearance is not.By coincidence this small pretty woman stares at him incredibly full brain to think Pan peach.He the temple month brocade return and don#8217;t ascend Wang Mu#8217;s Pan peach not become?

    The temple month brocade a make a noise everyone to imitate statue of Buddha is certainly lived to all generally stop to start in of the action looking at him quietly.

    The temple month brocade sees she stare at own face to daze not from ground the break into laughter voice words that again repeated 1 time just.This pretty woman why have been staring at this could it be that there is dirty mark on this face?

    Didn#8217;t have no at the moment a red Wu brain have already completely shut down.She the ground of Na Na looking at a temple the brocade the face for month ascend very clean

    Feel funny in the temple month brocade heart hence toast and say this small pretty woman toward the goddess the Queen Mother this and feel very is an amiability don#8217;t know that the goddess the Queen Mother can adjust her and send this of does heavy China palace speak of to heavy China palace and still lack an attending.

    What is still lack an attending?Weighed China palace to go into from the temple month brocade have only is a temple month brocade one person.Can at present is his incredibly begging for the attending from Wang Mu this exactly what is the row?

    Many fairy maidens all stare with anger red Wu many fairy males all green envy ghd iv styler take out a so that#8217;s why of the noodles permit to looking at red Wu.

    Is all right though her heart is happy.Can she really with is many innocent fairy maidens to all stare with anger red Wu many fairy males all take out a so that#8217;s why of the noodles permit to looking at red Wu.

    Now that already open mouth this temple again how good brush-off?Sit to smile an idea not to reduce at positive lord the goddess the Queen Mother of the directions.

    What do you exactly walk to carry?Incredibly drive the Qin order into heavy China palace!There but insulate with many fairy maidens of place.The bulb of lily pretty woman attaches in the ear side of red Wu to say.

    Come quick come to this temple to nearby let this temple living to see you so much.The goddess the Queen Mother pointed to point red Wu to signal hint her to come forward.

    The red Wu turns Mou to have no Cuo ground looking at bulb of lily pretty woman see the bulb of lily pretty woman do to be willing to help but unable to do so from beg much blessing of type.

  5. Aussie MP says:

    Ok Rockstar Philosopher,
    Let me tell you what I can, the traing we do over there is twofold. Firstly there is a trade training scholl to gives the local kids other career options apart from poppy growing or joining the Taliban. Teaching kids carpentry and bricklaying shouldn’t help them be better terrorists if they decide on a different career path. Secondly we do skills training for the local police so that they can do their job better its all about building your way out of a job (what people like to call an exit strategy)
    Yes there have been some unfortunate incidents where lives have been unintenionally lost but this is more to do with the enemy’s total disregard for human life than an intenional act on our part.

    Just becasue you can’t see a national interest doesn’t mean there is or isn’t one. But take it out on theose they decide where and when we go, not those who’s career choice involves following orders that we may or may not personally agree with.

    At least our way is better than one US plan of carpet bombing the entire contry and starting over again…..

  6. Amanda Parker says:

    I agree with David Fawcett’s comment to Alex Hughes…

    I was in the ADF as it is a part of my family’s tradition in both here Australia and Britain. I chose that lifestyle with a very real understanding of the dangers involved. I have family who were maimed, tortured and killed in the line of duty.

    And don’t even think about spouting some sort of rhetoric of women not being near the front lines or being in danger. There are worse things that can happen to a soldier in a war zone other than Death!

    As a soldier you are required to follow orders, this is a fact. As a soldier you have no right to question those orders, also a fact and not to mention this is ingrained from your first day in recruit training.

    Only outrage from the Country you serve is able to be a voice for you, because as a Soldier you don’t get the full picture given to you, you get given only your part of the job in the scheme of things.

    I had several friends in the ADF who resigned over the War against terror in Afghanistan, why…? Not because they were unpatriotic, but because they could not justify what they had seen and what they had done. These people would be nowhere near what I would consider weak or weak minded.

    So to go back to the author’s original post, to talk about why we’re in Afghanistan, and what we are hoping to achieve there.

    The list of questions are good, and I think like most Australians, we may not know even how to begin answering some of those questions.

    We are not a country that is rife with war within our boarders, we are not killed for our opinions by our government and we are not forced to live under strict religious doctrines. This is a lifestyle completely foreign to us!

    As part of the western societies, we will never truly understand the full extent of the barbarity of some other cultures. All we can do is help where we can, but I believe no-one should be force or coerced into our way of life. Wouldn’t that make us as bad as they are…?

    LOL… I’m picturing some people fuming right now behind the safety of their keyboards.

    I look forward to reading future posts.

    • Rhiannon Saxon says:

      Thank you for posting your perspective, it was very moving and also made some things clearer. You are right though – I wouldn’t know how to begin to answer these questions! I do think we have to look hard at whether our presence really does make things better or worse, and for that I suppose we need more information than we are getting. AND without the kind of macho rhetoric about us knowing stuff endangering our troops!

  7. Michelle Hallett says:

    @Alex, I can’t see anyone here who disagrees with your statement that we should support the troops in Afghanistan. Most people seem to be saying that we should question the decisions politicians have made.

    As for my statement that Australia is mostly there in a supporting role, it’s based on what I have read in the media, in particular the discussion on Insight. If it is incorrect, it just underlines my point, which is that those of us dependent on the media for information, don’t know enough.

    As for my belief that war has nothing to do with safe havens for terrorists, it is based on the fact that the determined terrorist seems to find recruits, places to train them and places to stage operations with or without a war claiming to prevent them. However, it is a belief, not based on fact, and I state this clearly.

    I think we’d have a better discussion here if we stopped going on the defensive and started looking at people’s arguments.

  8. Alex Hughes says:

    “I know that Australians are not fighting, they are there in a support role, building and training.”

    That looks like a statement of fact to me. It happens to be incorrect.

    “And I don’t believe this war has anything to do with safe havens for terrorist.”

    What do you base this belief on? What facts can you present in support of this belief?

    And yes I agree with you, most people who throw their opinions around should probably do a little research before expressing their opinions, their failure to do so is particularly offensive to soldiers who are hamstrung by decisions made by politicians who are equally ignorant. Put your life on the line and see how long you can remain cool, calm and collected.

  9. Nat C says:

    Debate doesn’t equal abuse, children.

    Ahem. Now. First of all, disagreement with the war doesn’t equal a lack of support for the troops – it’s ignorant, conservative rhetoric. I actually think we should have a *responsibility* to our troops to question the direction and success of any war effort. This should be done in an enlightened fashion – all war is bad, but sometimes it is necessary. We have a responsibility to the troops to ensure that what we ask of thim *is* necessary.

    If the nation overwhelmingly doesn’t believe it is necessary, and is vocal, the politicians will respond – it’s their nature. But to do so, we need to have debates and discussions like this.

  10. Rhiannon Saxon says:

    Are some of you people seriously trying to suggest that no-one should discuss any war in which our government has sent our army on our behalf, unless they are IN the army? Really? And you don’t think that may just set some sort of dangerous precedent?

  11. Dan Man says:

    Like I always say, if your not in the ADF, have been to Afghanistan, or going soon. Shut the hell up. Stick to your facebook, your crappy job and your Television.
    You dont know what is happening in the world, and just lay back and enjoy your freedom and consume.

    • The problem with that is that we are the ones who are paying for this little war, we pay to resupply you, we pay your wages.

      If you think we don’t have a right to know where that money is going you are very very wrong because guess what princess, we are the ones that decide if you fight, where you fight and when you fight. The armed forces in Australia do not decided when or if to go to war.

      You think the war is a necessary? Fine, prove it. This ‘You don’t want to know’ nonsense from Aussie MP is pure unadulterated bullshit and while you may be a happy little indoctrinated slave to authority the rest of us get suspicious when we are told that decisions have to be made in secret.

      Demanding unquestioning support for our armed services is an emotive and irrational position. I believe asking if our troops should be in Afghanistan is a necessary part of supporting our troops. If the goals of the mission cannot be accomplished then why should we put your lives at risk?

      • Rhiannon Saxon says:

        Well said.
        Not only is it is unadulterated bullshit, it is patronising. By all means say, ‘you don’t want to know’ to people who never try to find out, but don’t make assumptions about everyone else.

      • Alex Hughes says:

        “The problem with that is that we are the ones who are paying for this little war, we pay to resupply you, we pay your wages.”

        Outstanding, now do you think you can push for our Government to send us into combat with weapons built this century that actually work? That would sort of be your responsibility, see the next comment.

        If you think we don’t have a right to know where that money is going you are very very wrong because guess what princess, we are the ones that decide if you fight, where you fight and when you fight. The armed forces in Australia do not decided when or if to go to war.

        You, and I, have every right to know where the money is going. Fortunately you don’t decide if we fight, or where we fight or when we fight. Unfortunately, politicians do. Combat is a very difficult and obviously little understood art. The average General has spent something like 15 years in full time professional development. They’re better educated in this field than you can imagine, and yet they’re constantly over ruled by uneducated people whose only qualification is that they were more personable than someone else.

        Soldiers don’t decide “if” they fight, it’s their duty to do so, likewise it should be the duty of Australian citizens to ensure that they are adequately equipped, properly supported and their lives risked for adequate gain.

        I don’t know if the war is necessary, it’s very hard to judge. I sincerely doubt an absolute judgement can be made as it could in WW2.

        Demanding unquestioning support for our armed services is a rational and logical position. Questioning the decisions made by politicians in the deployment of our soldiers is a different proposition. Our soldiers should be supported until proven that an individual soldier has acted inappropriately, which is why those Commandos are currently facing an inquiry and court martial.

  12. Rockstar Philosopher says:

    I say it’s freaking ridiculous to be in the country training the people who will, once we leave, become the terrorists and terrorist trainers of the future. Remember those guys Al Qaeda? The ones who blew up the WTC? Where would they have been without their CIA training and support in the 80s?

    We’ve overthrown a repressive, yet honest, government with values we abhor, and replaced it with a government that is repressive, with values we abhor, but corrupt through to next century.

    Good work guys, this war is total fail.

  13. Michelle Hallett says:

    How much do people actually know about what we are doing in Afghanistan? I know that Australians are not fighting, they are there in a support role, building and training. That’s all I know and I suspect it’s not enough to be able to answer the questions you pose.

    I would say that I don’t support negotiation with the Taliban, because of their treatment of women. Better a corrupt government than one that imprisons half the population. But beyond that, I don’t know enough. I certainly have no data to assess if we are making the situation worse. And I don’t believe this war has anything to do with safe havens for terrorist. They operate quite happily in lots of other countries, such as Britain and Indonesia.

    • Rockstar Philosopher says:

      How to you kill 5 kids “training and supporting”?

      • Aussie MP says:

        As Dan Man said have you been there, do you know what’s going on or do you just go on whatever your favourite media spoon feeds you. Yes I’ve been there, yes I’ve investigated some of the incidents that are currently in the news. Do I know more about whats actually happening there, hell yes and will I tell you, NO. Why…
        1. My career is worth more than that.
        2. You can’t handle the truth.
        3. I wouldn’t dream of risking the good work that we are doing over there to placate the oxygen thieves that seem to infest places like this.

        If you don’t want to stand by our troops feel free to stand in front…..

      • michelle says:

        Good point. Perhaps the reports that Australia’s role in Afghanistan aren’t true

      • Rockstar Philosopher says:

        Not sure why I can’t reply to the two posts above but…

        To AussieMP:

        I can’t handle the truth? I hope you’re trying to be cute. The idea that politicians can handle a truth that that general public can’t handle the truth is anti-democratic. I’m aware that there’s a need for state secrets, but to suggest that I can’t handle the truth is the height of arrogance.

        Also, I’m getting a bit sick of this “you don’t know cos you weren’t there” crap. If we’re only involved in training and support, yet kids are getting killed when soldiers go into houses then either a) they’re using some seriously stuffed up training techniques or b) we’re being lied to.

        Now, this isn’t to say that I think we should crucify those soldiers (but yes, they probably should be facing an inquiry at least), but if they’re doing combat operations then what motivation could there possibly be to not be telling the public this other than for political convenience?

        Am I standing by the troops? I’m questioning whether it is worth them giving up their lives for something ill defined, with dubious benefits for our national interest. Damn right I’m standing by our troops. Since when does questioning the politicians who are sending these guys to war mean I don’t support the troops? Again, it’s called democracy, the thing they’re supposedly defending.

        If you don’t have the guts to stand a little debate and criticism then I suggest moving to a less democratic country, because that’s not how we do things here.

    • Alex Hughes says:

      I support open debate about almost all matters in a democracy.

      However, when it comes to war, when our soldiers are putting their lives on the line, when our comments could actually get them killed, I really wish pig ignorant civilians like yourself could have the common courtesy to keep quiet.

      Australians have elements of SASR and 4RAR Commando as well as 6RAR who are regular infantry. These are all combat units and you think we’re not fighting? We’re on a training mission which requires combat security details, but we’re also training Afghans how to fight, which means fighting alongside them.

      You don’t support negotiation with the Taliban because of their treatment of women? That’s the reason you’re choosing? How about ’cause their stated aim is to bring the entire world under sharia law, which is so much worse and encompasses your reason? Sharia law, aside from reducing 1st world countries to uneducated third world dumps, like every Muslim country, institutionalises a wide variety of behaviours we Westerners find unacceptable.

      You don’t believe that the war has anything to do with safe havens for terrorists? So where did the English terrorists get their training? Why have various security agencies from the Western world been monitoring groups of European Muslims travelling to and from “safe haven” countries like Afghan and Pstan? The al-Qaeda network has taken a beating over the last few years. This has stopped grand orchestrations but the unintentional result is homegrown terrorism, we can however, monitor that much better and enforce the rule of law to ensure terrorists never get beyond the planning stage as we’ve done on several occasions, including the group who’re currently on trial in Melbourne.

      • michelle says:

        You must be mad as he’ll today.

        I thought I made it quite clear that I was ignorant as to the true situation in Afghanistan. My point was probably quite similar to the one that you were making in that I was asking how I could comment on Afghanistan when I don’t really know what’s going on there. I think it is a point worth making.

        My reason for opposing negotiation with the Taliban is their treatment of women. I do not have a full understanding of sharia law and therefore am not willing to come out in opposition of something I do not understand. To do so would be the act of someone who was pig ignorant.

      • Suggesting that you can’t be informed about whether or not to fight a war because you aren’t a soldier is like suggesting you can’t be informed about whether or not to build a bridge because you aren’t a construction worker.

        Every large scale construction project estimates costs in terms of money and materials as well as estimated loss of life. Soldiers are not the only people who routinely risk their lives for the good of their country.

        To put this in perspective we have lost 21 people in Afghanistan and we lost 35 people building the West Gate bridge but I don’t remember any politician tearfully reading out the names of the construction workers who died in Parliament.

        Now imagine after that tragedy someone turned around and asked, ‘Should we really be building this bridge like this?’ and they got shouted down because they weren’t construction workers and they didn’t know what they were talking about?

        It simply wouldn’t happen, if fact it would be extraordinarily negligent if we didn’t ask that question.

        BTW did anyone know this was happening last week?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: